Yay, I like that you have the creative juices flowing, Moses. I agree that the mission simulation segment should be the climax of the whole show. I think we should look into the engineering and scientific challenges (and political and economic challenges, as well) of a mission to Mars (that feasibility study paper that a former Academy published that Marshal showed us could give us some places to start), and do kind of a "Well, it maybe be possible in the year 20XX [2012 is a bit soon, don't you think? The goal is to back to the Moon by 2020, and then use that as a stepping stone to Mars] to go to Mars, but we couldn't wait that long," type of seguay (or maybe not that cheesy?).
We should
definitely interview Dr. Landis. He's so awesome. Who is writing his thank you note? Maybe in the thank you mention that we'd like to talk to him again.
I've been doing a big of reading on NASA policy and news, as well. Maybe we could do a bit on the upcoming missions to Mars (i.e., the one that is being launched in August, and the ones that are being planned for 2009, etc.).
Also, a good book for us to check out (I have to confess I haven't read it yet, I just know the main jist of it) is Zubrin's
The Case for Mars. He describes how a manned mission to Mars (and colonization and terraforming) could be both feasible and affordable. Here's a
link to it on amazon.com. (Ha, now I feel like our show is turning into "Reading Rainbow" with Lavar Burton.)
I think we should have short segments on the engineering, biological, political, economic challenges of a manned mission to Mars. But, with each of those we have to tie in stuff to interest interns and potential interns. So this is where all of our research comes in. We should also ask the USRP kids, and people at the other Academies, if any of their work is directly (or indirectly) relevant to going to Mars (i.e., the Goddard group project is about designing a Mars mission).
Ok, I've done a lot of regurgitating, so I'll stop now. See you all at the meeting today.